MAGAZINE SECTION
EDITORIAL
UPS Industry Records 5.7% Growth...
COVER STORY
Power Electronic Industry Analysis Year Ending March 2016...
SPECIAL FOCUS
Better times ahead for Indian UPS Manufacturers...
SOFTWARE
WINDOWS 7 : Too good a software...
TECHNOLOGY
Technology : The new education Enabler...
FEATURE
Gender Equity : Not an even match...
BUSINESS
Retailing Market : Now making a statement...
NETWORKING
Evolution and Direction of Intelligent Network Architecture...
INTERNET
Wireless IP-based communications architecture...

READ ARCHIVES
Click Here for more articles from the previous issues

FREE NEWSLETTER
Your Email Address:

 
NETWORKING
Evolution and Direction of Intelligent Network Architecture

In an intelligent network (IN), the logic for controlling telecommunications services migrates from traditional switching points to computer-based, service-independent platforms. This provides network operators an open platform provisioned with generic service components that can interoperate with elements from different vendors, based on published, open-interface standards. This platform can be used to develop new and different services. Here, we will see the evolution and direction of the IN based on International Telecommunications Union–Telecommunications Standardization Sector (ITU–T) and European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI) standards development.

Architecture

Within traditional public switched telephone networks, the hierarchy of switching equipment and software must be upgraded each time a new service is added to the network. This is a complex and costly process. Further, network switches could not provide new number translation, routing, and charging capabilities.

As telecommunications services have evolved, the need to reduce the overhead for service use has increased along with the need to simplify maintenance & service upgrades or additions.

The IN essentially separates these services from switching equipment and organizes a centralized system so that providers need not perform major modifications on multiple switches when they introduce new services. The first step in IN development was to create separate service data in a centralized database outside the switching nodes.

The second step was to separate the service programs, or service logic, and to define a protocol that would permit interaction between switching systems and intelligent nodes containing the service logic and data. For service switching points and service control points (intelligent nodes) to work, common channel signaling, or out-of-band signaling, was required as opposed to the traditional inband signaling.

Relying on out-of-band signaling, or signaling system 7 (SS7) protocols, provides the mechanism to place service logic and service data into dedicated network elements that can remotely handle call control and connection. SS7 also enables intelligent applications to communicate with other applications and to access databases located in various parts of the network.

Certain network elements can be distinguished in every IN, as shown in Figure 1.

Service switching points (SSPs) are stored program control switches that interface to the SS7 signaling network. The SSP embodies the call control function (CCF) and service switching function (SSF) entities. The SSF recognizes IN service calls and routes the appropriate queries to the service control function (SCF) that resides in a service control point (SCP) via the SS7 network through signaling transfer points (STPs). STPs are high-capacity, high-reliability packet switches that transport signaling messages, using large routing databases, between the IN nodes.

SCP commands are used by the SSP to process calls. The SCP is a fault-tolerant, high-capacity, transaction-processing entity that provides call-handling information in response to SSP queries. The service management point (SMP) provides operation, administration, and maintenance functions for the IN. The intelligent peripheral (IP) provides enhanced services or functions under the control of an SCP, possibly relayed by an SSP, such as play announcements and speech recognition.

As seen in Figure 2, the IN architecture is fundamentally based on SS7 and its protocol architecture. A common signaling transport capability known as the message transfer part (MTP) handles the corresponding open systems interconnection (OSI) physical, data-link, and network layers. The next level, signaling connection control part (SCCP), augments the MTP by providing both connectionless and connection-oriented message transport, as well as enabling addressing capabilities for message routing. The transaction capabilities application part (TCAP) provides procedures for real-time transaction control. The final layer, IN application protocol (INAP) defines the operations required between IN network elements, such as SSPs and SCPs. All of these basic elements form the infrastructure in IN, which supports the notion of separating service-control functions from service switching-functions, to realize more rapid-services development and deployment. Another equally important concept in IN has been the notion of service independence. Here, the primary goal has been to identify and create generic sets of reusable service components that could be used to build new services and loaded into SCPs to generate new services rapidly. These service components are also known as service independent building blocks (SIBs). To provide a framework that would lead toward IN engineering standardization, the IN conceptual model (INCM) was developed (Figure 3). The INCM, which is solely a tool for describing IN capabilities and characteristics, is composed of four "planes" that represent different aspects of implementing IN services. This model depicts the relationship among services and service features, global service logic (SIBs), distributed service logic, and the physical network entities such as SCP and SSP. These planes include the service plane, the global functional plane, the distributed functional plane, and the physical plane as shown in Figure 3.

The service plane describes services from a user's perspective, where a service consists of generic blocks or service features that make up part or all of a service (e.g., Freephone). The global functional plane deals with service creation and is comprised of the SIBs that will be used to create service features. Global service logic defines how SIBs are linked together to form features and how these SIBs interact with another basic SIB known as the basic call process (BCP). The BCP is the process that optimally supports services that do not require special features and is basic to the processing of all services.

The distributed functional plane defines a set of functional entities that perform specific actions. SIBs are implemented through a specific sequence of functional-entity actions performed by those functional entities. The information flows defined in the distributed functional plane are implemented in the physical plane through the appropriate INAP.

Conclusion

IN is also impacting the mobility segment, as fixed-mobile convergence operations emerge. Current mobility systems have incorporated IN capabilities to support call routing, charging, handover, and other related mobility functions. There is current interest in merging mobility systems with the IN in a uniform approach (i.e. fixed mobile convergence), since IN already provides the required network intelligence for fixed networks. Future generation-mobility-systems standards, such as the universal mobile telecommunications system (UMTS) are being based on the IN architecture within ETSI.

 

 

 

Bookmark and Share

SD Awards
SD's UPS AWARDS 2015-16
SD Awards 2016
Survey Highlights
SD's Power Electronic Industry Analysis, year ending March 2016
How They Faired
SD's Top 10
Power Electronic Companies
SD's Top 5
Online UPS Manufacturers
SD's Top 3
Line-Interactive UPS Manufacturers
SD's Top
Home UPS/CVT/Inverter Company
Special Awards
SD's UPS SURVEY 2015-16
SD's UPS Users' Choice Awards 2016
Companies to Watch
SD Users' Satisfaction Rating
SD's SOLAR AWARDS 2015-2016
SDs top 5, SPV Panel Manufacturers of the year 2016
SDs top 5, SPCU Manufacturers of the year 2016
SDs top 5, Grid Sharing Solar Power Solution Provider of the year 2016
SDs top 5, Off-Grid Sharing Solar Power Solution Provider of the year 2016
SDS Company of the year in Real Time Solar Power Generation Monitoring of the year 2015 - 2016
SDs A++ SD Green Star Rating 2016